The Florida Law Weekly

SAMPLE ISSUE

CHOOSE AN AREA: SEARCH FLW OPINIONSSUBJECT MATTER INDEXESSUMMARIESNEW CASESTABLESPRIOR ISSUES

22 Fla. L. Weekly D2231c

OSCAR JOLLY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District. Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Probation revocation -- Split sentence -- Credit for time served -- Time served on probation -- Split sentence of fourteen and one-half years imposed upon revocation of defendant's probation was illegal because, when combined with the ten months defendant had previously served on probation, the combination of new sanctions exceeded the fifteen year statutory maximum for underlying offense

OSCAR JOLLY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District. Case No. 96-01654. Opinion filed September 17, 1997. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Robert J. Boylston, Judge. Counsel: James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

(FULMER, Judge.) Oscar Jolly argues on appeal that the split sentence imposed upon revocation of his probation is illegal because, when combined with time already spent on probation, it exceeds the fifteen-year statutory maximum. We agree.

On May 31, 1994, Jolly was sentenced to time served, which was approximately ten months in the county jail, followed by ten years' probation. On March 20, 1996, the trial court revoked Jolly's probation for committing a new criminal offense and sentenced him to four and one-half years' imprisonment, with credit for time served, followed by ten years' probation. The written sentence filed on the same day reflects that Jolly was not given credit for time previously served on probation.

In Waters v. State, 662 So. 2d 332, 333 (Fla. 1995) (quoting Bragg v. State, 644 So. 2d 586, 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)), the supreme court held:

In imposing a sentence following a revocation of probation, the combination of [new] sanctions imposed must not exceed the statutory maximum for the underlying offense. If the trial court includes probation as part of a sentence upon revocation of probation, the trial court must give credit for any time previously served on probation if the new period of probation together with other sanctions (including jail and prison credit) and the time previously served on probation total more than the statutory maximum for the underlying offense.

The time previously served on probation is calculated from the date probation is imposed until the date of revocation. See Francois v. State, 695 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 1997).

In this case, Jolly faced a total sanction of fifteen years, pursuant to sections 775.082(3)(c) and 800.04, Florida Statutes (1991), for committing a lewd and lascivious act on a child less than sixteen years of age. Upon revocation of probation, Jolly's jail and probation sentence totalled fourteen and one-half years. When this period is added to the months previously served on probation, from May 31, 1994, through March 20, 1996, the total exceeds the fifteen-year statutory maximum.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with Waters. (PARKER, C.J., and PATTERSON, JJ., Concur.)

* * *

Are you a nonsubscriber and just need to get a case? Try our 2-Hour or 24-Hour Access! Log in for a limited period to all 3 of our publications. Details Here	FLW Mobile - For easier navigation on your mobile phone!
	© 2025 Judicial & Administrative Research Associates, Inc.	*Add unlimited access to FLW Online* for as little as $10.50 per month.** This price is available to anyone whose office subscribes to FLW. Call 800-351-0917, e-mail us--or click here for more details.	Sign up for free e-mail alerts of Florida appellate decisions, within hours of filing.