LOG IN
    SELECT A PUBLICATION:
Florida Law Weekly
FLW Supplement
FLW Federal
User Name:
Password:
 
Forgotten your password?


CONTACT
    Toll-free: 800-351-0917
    E-mail us
    Submit Opinions

PLACE AN ORDER
    Print Editions
    Online Editions
    Bound Volumes
    2/24-Hour Online Access


OUR PUBLICATIONS
    Florida Law Weekly
    FLW Supplement
    FLW Federal
    Collected Cases
    Sample FLW Online


RESEARCH
    Cross Citations
    Week In Review
    Rule Revisions
    Review Granted
    Current Issue Index
     Civil Section
     Criminal Section
    2017 Cumulative Index
     Civil Section
     Criminal Section
    2016 Cumulative Index
     Civil Section
     Criminal Section
    Florida Statutes
    Helpful Links



  
Online Research for Florida Cases
More current. Less expensive.

Florida Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal opinions, with headnotes and subject matter indexes
Most new releases added on day of filing
Florida Circuit Court and County Court opinions, with headnotes and subject matter indexes Opinions of U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, and U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts in Florida, with headnotes and subject matter indexes
The Week In Review
Headnotes of editor-selected opinions
filed during the week of October 16 - October 20, 2017

Civil Cases   Criminal Cases

Database covers: January, 1995 - Present

Learn more about Florida Law Weekly.

Database covers: October, 1992 - Present

Learn more about FLW Supplement.

Cases of Interest

Database covers: March, 2001 - Present

Learn more about FLW Federal.

Cases of Interest


RECENT RELEASES - FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

ATTORNEY'S FEES--CONTINGENCY FEE MULTIPLIER. The district court erroneously held that the application of a contingency fee multiplier to the award of attorney's fees to a prevailing party is limited to "rare" and "exceptional" circumstances. The trial court properly applied a contingency fee multiplier to the award of attorney's fees to insureds who prevailed in an action against their insurer upon finding that the relevant market required a contingency fee multiplier for the insureds to obtain competent counsel, that the insureds' attorney could not have mitigated the risk of nonpayment, and that the case was a complex commercial case.
VIEW OPINION (login required)

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS--CRIMINAL--AMENDMENT. The Court adopted amendments to the following standard criminal jury instructions: 3.6(o) (Transferred Intent); 11.17(a) (Soliciting a [Child] [Person Believed by the Defendant to be a Child] for Unlawful Sexual Conduct Using Computer Services or Devices); 11.17(b) (Soliciting a Parent, Legal Guardian, or Custodian of a Child for Unlawful Sexual Conduct Using Computer Services or Devices); 11.17(c) (Traveling to Meet a Minor); and 11.17(d) (Traveling to Meet a Minor Facilitated by Parent, Legal Guardian, or Custodian). The Court noted these significant changes to the jury instructions as amended: "First, with regard to Instruction 3.6(o), the phrase "but instead" is replaced with "and in the process," the word "the" is replaced with "any," and the word "actually" is removed from the instruction." Secondly, "[W]ith regard to Instructions 11.17(a), (b), (c), and (d), the crime of Unlawful Use of a Two-Way Communications Device is added as a category two lesser included offense. With regard to Instruction 11.17(b), the phrase "Legal Guardian, or Custodian" is added to the first sentence of the instruction to mirror its title and the language of section 847.0135(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2017)."
VIEW OPINION (login required)