FLW Mobile - For easier navigation on your mobile phone! |
|||
![]() Research Associates, Inc. |
|
||
LOG IN CONTACT Toll-free: 800-351-0917 E-mail us Submit Opinions PLACE AN ORDER Print Editions Online Editions Bound Volumes 2/24-Hour Online Access OUR PUBLICATIONS Florida Law Weekly FLW Supplement FLW Federal Collected Cases RESEARCH Cross Citations Week In Review Rule Revisions Review Granted Current Issue Index Civil Section Criminal Section 2025 Cumulative Index Civil Section Criminal Section Public Reprimands Florida Statutes Helpful Links |
More current. Less expensive.
Our e-alert service lets you know when new cases have been posted, for any of our publications. No charge.
RECENT RELEASES - FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
ATTORNEY'S FEES--OFFER OF JUDGMENT--JOINT OFFER--APPORTIONMENT. Based on precedent mandating strict compliance with rule 1.442(c)(3)'s apportionment requirement, the court held that rule 1.442(c)(3) requires apportionment of a joint proposal regarding a unified, single claim. As such, the offer of settlement submitted by married homeowners for a unified, single claim for damages was invalid for failing to state the amount and terms attributable to each homeowner.
|